Effect of pesticides on population dynamics of Trichoderma sp. and tomato plant in pot culture study

Effect of pesticides on Trichoderma and performance of tomato

Authors

  • ABISAG LALREMRUATPUII SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106, India
  • SUSANTA BANIK Dept. of Plant Pathology, SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v9i02.10120

Keywords:

Trichoderma, mancozeb, copper oxychloride, monocrotophos, chlorpyriphos, metribuzin, pendimethalin

Abstract

A pot culture study was conducted to see the effect of different agrochemicals on the survival of Trichoderma in the soil in association with tomato plants during March to June 2018. Two fungicides (Copper oxychloride and Mancozeb), two insecticides (Monocrotophos and Chlorpyriphos), two herbicides (Metribuzin and Pendimethalin) were used to assess their effect in pot culture condition with tomato as a test plant. Effect of Trichoderma in presence of the chemicals under study on germination % of tomato seeds was non-significant. The treatments incorporated with chemicals (Trichoderma with chlorpyriphos, metribuzin and pendimethalin) showed an inhibitory effect on growth parameters (height, number of leaves and branches, leaf area and fresh weight) of the tomato plant. Trichoderma in presence of copper oxychloride recorded a plant height of 40.75 cm at 60 DAS at par with control (40.83 cm). Among the treatments applied with chemicals, at 15 DAS the population of Trichoderma was maximum in control i.e. Trichoderma alone (19.58×104 cfu g-1 of soil) which is statistically at par with Trichoderma+mancozeb 75% WP (19.08×104 cfu/g of soil) and Trichoderma+monocrotophos 36% SL (Soluble Liquid) (19.50×104 cfu g-1  of soil), while the lowest population of Trichoderma was observed in soil with the treatment of pendimethalin (10.49×104). The two herbicides metribuzin and pendimethalin and the insecticide chlorpyriphos had overall inhibitory effect on the biocontrol agent Trichoderma and the tomato plant in the present study.

Author Biographies

ABISAG LALREMRUATPUII , SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106, India

Dept. of Plant Pathology, SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106, India

SUSANTA BANIK, Dept. of Plant Pathology, SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106

Dept. of Plant Pathology, SASRD, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland-797106, , India

References

Abdel - Gawad AA. 2010. Effect of Sevin on growth of carrot. Cairo University, Dar Elthgafa Press, Cairo, Egypt.

de Santiago A, Quintero JM, Avilés M and Delgado A. 2011. Effect of Trichoderma asperellum strain T34 on iron, copper, manganese, and zinc uptake by wheat grown on a calcareous medium. Plant and Soil 342: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0670-1

Dubey SC, Tripathi A and Singh B. 2012. Combination of soil application and seed treatment formulations of Trichoderma species for integrated management of wet root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82: 356–362.

Gafar MO, Elhag AZ and Abdelgader MA. 2013. Impact of Pesticides Malathion and Sevin on growth of snake cucumber (Cucumis melo L. var. Flexuosus) and soil. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 1(3): 81–84.

Gampala K and Pinnamaneni R. 2010. Studies on the compatibility of Trichoderma viride with certain Agro-chemicals. Current World Environment. 5(1): 155–158. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.5.1.25

Ganesan S, Kuppusamy RG and Sekar R. 2007. Integrated management of stem rot disease (Sclerotium rolfsii) of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using Rhizobium and Trichoderma harzianum (ITCC – 4572). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 31(2): 103–108.

Grichar WJ, Sestak DC, Brewer KD, Besler BA, Stichler CR and Smith DT. 2001. Sesame (Sesame indicum L.) tolerance and weed control with soil applied herbicides. Crop Protection 20: 389–394.

Kang S, Lumactud R, Li N, Bell TH, Kim HS, Park SY and Lee YH. 2021. Harnessing chemical ecology for environment-friendly crop protection. Phytopathology, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-21-0035-RVW.

Kumar G, Singh A, Pandey S, Singh J, Chauhan SS and Srivastava M. 2021. Morphomolecular Identification of Trichoderma sp. and their Mycoparasitic Activity Against Soil Borne Pathogens. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 613 – 627. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.23910/1.2020.2131

Lang M and Cai Z. 2009. Effects of chlorothalonil and carbendazimon nitrification and denitrification in soils. Journal of Environmental Sciences 21(4): 458–467.

Li RX, Cai F, Pang G, Shen QR, Li R and Chen W. 2015. Solubilisation of phosphate and micronutrients by Trichoderma harzianum and its relationship with the promotion of tomato plant growth. PLoS One 10, e0130081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130081

Lo CT and Lin CY. 2002. Screening strains of Trichoderma spp. for plant growth enhancement in Taiwan. Plant Pathology Bulletin 11(4): 215–220.

López-Bucio J, Pelagio-Flores R and Herrera-Estrella A. 2015. Trichoderma as biostimulant: Exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam) 196: 109–123.

Martinez-Medina A, Fernandez I, Lok GB, Pozo MJ, Pieterse CMJ and Van Wees SCM. 2017. Shifting from priming of salicylic acid- to jasmonic acid-regulated defences by Trichoderma protects tomato against the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. New Phytology 213: 1363–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14251

Prohmchum C. 1985. Selectivity of butachlor and pendimethalin in different cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.). University Library, University at Los Baños.

Ramanagouda G and Naik MK. 2021. Compatibility studies of indigenous Trichoderma isolates with pesticides. Indian Phytopathology 74: 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-021-00325-3

Uddin MN, Rahman Uu, Khan W, Uddin N and Muhammad M. 2018. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on tomato plant growth and its antagonistic activity against Pythium ultimum and Phytophthora capsici. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 28: 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-018-0032-5.

Saxena D, Tewari AK and Rai D. 2014. The in vitro effect of some commonly used fungicides, insecticides and herbicides for their compatibility with Trichoderma harzianum PBT23. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(4): 444–448.

Senedecor GW and Cochran GW. 1967. Statistical methods. The Lowa State University Press Ames, Lowa.

Shrivastava S. 2015. Non target effects of various herbicides on biocontrol agent Trichoderma spp. and pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Indian Journal of Applied and Pure Biology 30(1): 11–19.

Sinha SN, Agnihotri NP and Gajbhye VT. 1996. Field evaluation of pendimethalin for weed control in onion and persistence in plant and soil. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 4: 71–75.

Smith MAK. 2004. Pendimethalin phytotoxicity and seedling weed control in Indian spinach (Basella alba L.). Crop Protection 23: 201–204.

Sondhia S. 2013. Harvest time residues of pendimethalin in tomato, cauliflower, and radish under field conditions. Toxicology and Environmental Chemistry 95(2): 254–259.

Topolovec-Pintaric S. 2019. Trichoderma: Invisible Partner for Visible Impact on Agriculture, Trichoderma - The Most Widely Used Fungicide, Mohammad Manjur Shah, Umar Sharif and Tijjani Rufai Buhari, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83363.

Yaqub F and Shahzad S. 2011. Efficacy and persistence of microbial antagonists against Sclerotium rolfsii under field conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(5): 2627–2634.

Zeilinger S, Gruber S, Bansal R and Mukherjee PK. 2016. Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma – Chemistry meets genomics. Fungal Biological Review 30: 7490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2016.05.001

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16