Yield loss assessment due to Alternaria blight disease in rapeseed and mustard

Yield loss due to alternaria Blight in rapeseed and mustard

Authors

  • HEMANT KUMAR SINGH Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad- 224 229 (U.P.)
  • PRADIP KUMAR Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India
  • S K SINGH Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v8i03.1669

Keywords:

Rapeseed-mustard, variety, yield loss, fungicides, Alternaria brassicae, Variety, fungicides

Abstract

Alternaria blight disease in rapeseed-mustard caused by Alternaria brassicae and A. brassicicola is the important disease of rapeseed-mustard crop in India. The experiment was conducted to assess the yield losses due to Alternaria blight in different released cultivars of rapeseed-mustard during Rabi 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Student’s Instructional Farm of the A. N. D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya by planting 15 varieties of the rapeseed-mustard namely RH-749, Pusa gold, KBS-3, GSL-5, GSL-2, Pusa mustard-27, Jhumka, Anuradha, PT-30, T-27, PM-25, Pusa aditya, PT-303, Sheetal, TMLC-2 in six replications (three protected and three unprotected under natural conditions). Seed of each variety were treated with Apron @ 6g/kg and three spray of Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazol 50% (Nativo) @ 0.08% in protected replication. The minimum disease severity on leaves and pods were recorded in protected and unprotected conditions in the variety GSL-5 (2.65% and 16.26%), (1.75% and 6.32%) followed by GSL-2 (3.20% and 19.72%), (1.89% and 6.75%) Pusa aditya (6.91% and 19.89%), (2.18% and 7.20%) and Sheetal (7.99% and 23.13%), (3.21% and 7.43%), respectively. On the basis of mean values the minimum infection rate on pods was recorded GSL-2 (0.083 and 0.042) followed by Pusa aditya (0.089 and 0.045), respectively. The minimum AUDPC on leaf under protected and unprotected was recorded on cultivar GSL-5 (76.40 and 496.20) followed by GSL-2 (88.80 and 596.85), Pusa aditya (205.35 and 588.25), Sheetal (241.70 and 717.30) and RH-749 (244.95 and 950.85), respectively. Whereas the minimum AUDPC on pod was recorded with variety GSL-5 (32.10) and Pusa aditya (200.25) followed by [GSL-2 (34.65) and Sheetal (206.65)], [Pusa aditya (39.35) and RH-749 (566.41)] and [Sheetal (60.95) and Pusa mustard-27 (741.75)], respectively. The maximum yield avoidable loss (%) was recorded T-27 (46.67%) followed by Jhumka (44.53%, Anuradha (40.00%), KBS-3 (38.77%) and Pusa gold (34.13%), respectively. Minimum avoidable loss (%) was recorded on cultivar GSL-5 (11.09%) followed by Anuradha (14.36%), GSL-2 (17.73%), RH-749 (17.90%) and Pusa aditya, respectively. In present investigation out of 15 genotypes examined for blight resistance, GSL-5, Pusa Aditya, Sheetal and GSL-2 exhibited good level of partial resistance i.e. moderately resistance. Other 11 varieties RH-749, Pusa gold, Pusa mustard-27, Jhumka, Anuradha, PT-30, PT-303, T-27, KBS-3, TMLC-2 and PM-25 were susceptible based on the mean basis severity (PDI), reduced apparent infection rate and lesser value of AUDPC.

Author Biographies

HEMANT KUMAR SINGH, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad- 224 229 (U.P.)

Department of Plant Pathology, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad- 224 229 (U.P.)

PRADIP KUMAR , Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India

Department of Plant Pathology, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India

S K SINGH, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India

Crop Research Station, Bahraich, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya - 224 229 (U.P.) India

References

Anonymous 2018. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2018, Government of India Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Page. 110-112.

Chattopadhyay C. 2008. Management of diseases of rapeseedmustard with special reference to Indian conditions. Sustainable Production of Oilseeds : Rapeseed-mustard Technology, Pp. 364-88.

Gupta A K, Rishiraj, Kumari K, Singh SP, Solanki IS. 2018. Management of major diseases in Indian mustard through balanced fertilization, cultural practices and fungicides in calcareous soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 88: 229-239.

Kaushik C D, Saharan G S and Kaushik J C. 1984. Magnitude of losses in yield and management of Alternaria blight in rapeseed-mustard. Indian Phytopath, 37(2), 398.

Kolte S J, Awasthi R P and Vishwanath. 1987. Assessment of yield losses due to Alternaria blight in rapeseed and mustard. Indian Phytopath., 40(2), 209-211.

Kolte S J. (2002). Diseases and their management in oilseed crops, new Paradigm in oilseeds and oil: research and development needs (Rai Mangla, Harvir Singh, D.M. Hegde ed.). Indian Society Oilseeds Res., 244-252.

Kumar A. 1997. Assessment and economics of avoidable yield losses due to Alternaria blight in brassicas. Pl. Dis. Res., 12, 152-156.

Kumar A. 2001. Assessment of yield losses at various levels of Alternaria blight infection in rapeseed-mustard. Himachal J. Agri. Res., 25 (1/2): 24-26.

Kumar B and Kolte S J. (2001). Progression of Alternaria blight of mustard in relation to components of resistance. Indian Phytopath., 54 (3): 329-331.

Kumar B. 2008. Assessment of slow blighting (Alternaria brassicae) resistance and yield in Indina mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss). Indian Phytopath., 61 (2) : 179-183.

Kumar H, Singh H K, Singh R K and Mishra P. 2014. Yield loss assessment due to Alternaria blight in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.]. Int. J. Agricult. Stat. Sci. 10 (1): 299-302.

Meah, M B, Hau B and Siddique M B. (2002). Relationship between disease parameters of Alternaria blight (Alternaria brassicae) and yield of mustard. J. Pl. Dis.Prot., 109(3): 243- 251.

Meena P D, Awasthi R P, Chattopadhyay C, Kolte S J and Kumar A. 2010. Alternaria blight : a chronic disease in rapeseed-mustard. J. Oilseed Brassica, 1, 1-11.

Prasad R, Saxena D and Chandra S. 2003. Yield losses by Alternaria blight in promising genotypes of Indian mustard. Indian Phytopath., 56(2), 205-206.

Rajvanshi N K, Singh H K and Maurya MK. 2020. Management of Alternaria blight of Indian mustard through combo of seed treatment and foliar sprays of bioagent and fungicides. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(5): 1121-1123.

Saharan G S 1992. In “Advances in Oilseed Research” Vol. I (eds. Kumar, D. and Rai, M.) Scientific publishers, Jodhpur. pp. 152-181.

Singh AK, Singh AK, Choudhary AK, Kumari A and Kumar R. 2017.Towards oilseeds sufficiency in India: Present status and way forward. Journal of AgriSearch 4 (2):80-84.

Singh H K and Singh R B and Maurya K N. (2016). Management of major fungal foliar diseases of rapeseed-mustard. Res. on Crops. 16 (1): 182-188.

Singh H K, Singh R B; Singh M and Maurya K N. 2014. Management of Alternaria blight in Indian mustard through genotypes, date of sowing and micronutrients. Res. Environ. Life. Sci., 7 (3): 161-164.

Singh H K, Srivastava S, Singh R B and Singh A K. 2013. Managementof Alternaria blight of rapeseed-mustard. J. pl. Dis. Sci., 8 (2): 131-136.

Singh H K; Singh R B and Maurya K N. 2015. Management of major fungal foliar diseases of rapeseed-mustard. Res. on Crops. 16 (1): 182-188.

Singh HK, RB Singh, KN Maurya.2014a.Management of Alternaria Blight of Indian Mustard through Resistance Inducing Chemicals. Journal of AgriSearch 1 (2), 108-111.

Singh R B and Singh R N. 2005. Fungicidal management of foliar diseases of mustard in mid-eastern India. Indian Phytopath., 58(1), 51-56.

Singh R, Singh AK and Kumar P. 2014b. Performance of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncia L.) in Response to Integrated Nutrient Management. Journal of AgriSearch1 (1): 9-12.

Singh S, Singh, R P, Singh H K and Kumar K. 2011. Fatty acid profile of some promising genotypes of Indian mustard. Plant Archives, 11(2), 1079-1082.

Tewari J P and Conn K L. 1993. Reactions of some wild crucifers to Alternaria brassicae. Bulletin OILB_SROP, 16(9), 53-58.

Published

2021-12-22

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>