Comparison of Crop Evapotranspiration by FAO, BREB and Pristley- Taylor methodsin mustard Crop in Central Bihar Region

Authors

  • JOYDEEP MUKHERJEE IARI, NEW DELHI
  • SURAJIT MONDAL

Abstract

Untimely sowing, poor crop stands and absence of lack of high yielding varieties and lack of zone
specific crop production technology, moisture stress and uncertain and extreme weather
conditions are the major factor which govern the productivity of rapeseed-mustard in eastern India
particularly in Bihar. This study was conducted in the experimental farm of ICAR Research
Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar during 2011-12 and 2012-13. Bowen ratio energy balance
(BREB) method is a micrometeorological method by combining Bowen ratio with energy balance
equation of earth surface. The climate of the experimental site is semi-arid with dry hot summer
and mild winters. Summers are long (early April–August) with monsoon setting in between July
and September. May and June are the hottest months with mean daily maximum temperature
ranging from 30 to 40°C. At 11.00 to 12.00 hours, the Rn reaches the maxima and its value reduces
drastically after 15.00 hours. ET0 calculate by established empirical equation was compared with
the pan evapotranspiration (ETpan) data and it was observed that PT method can be safely used to
calculate ET0 in the study zone. The crop evapotranspiration (ETc) using Bowen Ratio Energy
Balance method was also observed and compared with output from PT method. The ratio between
LE/Rn attained the higher value at siliqua emergence (SE) and pod formation (PF) stages indicating
higher water demand during the same crop growth period.

 

References

Anonymous. 2014. Area and production of rice in India.

http://www.indiastat.com.

Ashktorab H, Pruitt WO, Paw UKT and George WV. 1989. Energy

balance determination close to the soil surface using a

micro-Bowen ratio system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

: 259-4.

Bowen IS. 1926. The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by

evaporation from any water surface. Phys. Rev. 27: 779–87.

Campbell GS. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental BioPhysics.

Springer Verlag, N.Y. 159 p.

Chan ASK, Prueger JH and Parkin TB. 1998. Comparison of closedchamber

and Bowen-ratio methods for determining

methane flux from peatland surfaces. Journal of Environment

Quality 27: 232-239.

German ER. 1999. Regional evaluation of evapotranspiration in the

Everglades. In Proc. Int.Symp. Ecohydraulics, 3rd, 13-16 July,

Salt Lake City, UT[CD-ROM]. Int. Assoc. of Hydraulic Eng. and

Res., Madrid, Spain.

Hatfield JL. 1990. Methods of estimating evapotranspiration. P.435-

In B.A. Stewart and D. R. Nielsen (ed.).Irrigation of

agricultural crops. Agron Monogr.30. ASA, CSSA, MADISON.

WI.

Jamieson PD. 1982. Comparison of methods of estimating maximum

evapotranspiration from barley crop. N.Z.J.Sci.25: 175-81.

Jegede OO. 2002. Observations of daytime surface energy balance in

cloudy tropical conditions at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. MAUSAM53:

–66.

Malek E and Bingham G E. 1993. Comparison of the Bowen ratioenergy

balance and the water balance methods for the

measurement of evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 146:

–20.

Mokate AS, Varshneya MC, Naidu TRV and Sadani LK. 1995.

Evaporation and energy balance studies over wheat crop by

Bowen-ratio energy balance method. Journal of Maharastra

Agricultural University. 20(2):273-6.

Mukherjee J, Kumar S and Mondal S.2015. Surface energy fluxes and

radiation interception in mustard in Central Bihar condition.

Journal of Agrophysics 15(1)103:7.

Mukherjee J, Bal SK, Singh G, Bhattacharya BK, Singh H and Kaur

P.2012. Surface energy fluxes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Journal of Agrometeorology14(1): 16-20.

Murray FW. 1967. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure.

Journal of Applied Meteorology 6:203-4.

Nkemdirim L C and Haley PF. 1973.An evaluation of grassland

evapotranspiration. Agricultural Meteorology 11: 373–83.

Priestley CHB and Taylor RJ.1972.On the assessment of surface heat

flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Monthly

Weather Review 100:81-2.

Rana G. 1998. A model of the Priestley-Taylor coefficient for

evapotranspiration estimates: the reference crop case in a

Mediterranean region. AgriculturaMediterranea128: 11-20.

Singh HK, Kavita, Singh RB and Maurya KN. 2014b. Management of

Alternaria Blight of Indian Mustard through Resistance

Inducing Chemicals. Journal of AgriSearch1(2): 108-11.

Singh R, Singh AK and Kumar P. 2014a. Performance of Indian

Mustard (Brassica juncia L.) in Response to Integrated Nutrient

Management. Journal of AgriSearch1(1): 9-12.

Singh SS, Singh AK, Sundaram PK.2014c. Agrotechnological options

for upscaling agricultural productivity in eastern Indo

gangetic plains under impending climate change situations: A

review. Journal of Agrisearch1 (2): 55-5.

Steiner JL, Howell TA and Schneider AD.1991. Lysimetric evaluation

of daily potential evapotranspiration models for grain

sorghum. Agronomy Journal 83: 240-47.

Tanner C.B. 1960. Energy balance approach to evapotranspirationfrom crops. Soil Sci. Am. Proc. 24:545-9.

Tetens O. 1930. Ubereini gemeteorologische Begriffe.z. Geophysics.

:297-309.

Todd RW, Event SR and Howell TA. 2000. The Bowen-ratio-energy

balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated

alfalfa evaluated in semiarid advective environment.

Agricultural Forest Meteorology103:335-48.

Watanabi M and Nakayama T. 2004. Simulation of drying

phenomena associated with vegetation change caused by

invasion of alder (Alnus japonica) in Kushiro Mire. Water

Resources Research40: 2-15.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-10