Effects of Paracoccus marginatus (Mealy bug) and Myzus persicae (Mite) Attack on forming of Exacum ritigalensis (Binara/Ginihiriya) Flower

Authors

  • CHATHURA DINETH PERARA Department of Agriculture Biology Faculty of agriculture University of Ruhuna Sri Lanka
  • NILANTHI DAHANAYAKE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v3i4.6712

Abstract

Floriculture, which consists of the cultivation of ornamental plants used for cut flowers, flowering and non-flowering potted plants, and of the production of seeds, bulbs and large trees, is an important part while introducing aesthetic valuable wild plants varities.  Exacum ritigalensis, which can grow as flowering pot plants, are encountered from mealybug and aphids as major pests. This study was conducted to determine to evaluate mealybug and aphid attack on the damage of E. ritigalensis flower forming. Seeds of Exacum ritigalensis were taken in Pannala, Sri Lanka and potted in green house at the Department of Agriculture Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. Four pots replicates were conducted on E. ritigalensis plants that were infested with Paracoccus marginatus and four pots replicates were conducted on E. ritigalensis plants that were infested with Myzus persicae.  Two pots were used as controls. Potting medium was taken 1:1:1; sand, compost and topsoil and one E. ritigalensis plants were cared in each pot. At the flowering stage, two adults of Paracoccus marginatus which were taken from infected papaya plant (Carica papaya) and two aphids which were taken from infected tobacco plant (Nicotiana tabacum L.) introduced to the every branch of E. ritigalensis plants separately. Data were collected from maturity stage of the flower (after blooming 3days). Data regarding E. ritigalensis flowers diameter reduction were subjected to analysis mean average value and compared with the control. Statistical analysis was performed Least Significant Difference (LSD) using SAS software (version 9.1.3). Mean average E. ritigalensis flower diameter in control pots was 5.90 cm and average mean diameters of the infected plant’s flowers were 4.05 cm. It showed significant reduction of flower formation which were attacked by mealybug. There were no significant difference of flowers which plant attacked by aphids and it was shown the reduction of number of flowers per bunch.  Mealybugs and aphids severely damage to E. ritigalensis flower production. Researchers and farmers should have to use control measures to prevent mealybug and ants entering to the plantation.

Key words: Aphid, Exacum, floricultural pests, Mealybug

Author Biography

CHATHURA DINETH PERARA, Department of Agriculture Biology Faculty of agriculture University of Ruhuna Sri Lanka

Lecturer,
Department of Agriculture Biology

References

Ana L. B. G. P. and Silva C. R. S. 2002. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of ornamental plants from São Carlos, São Paulo state, Brazil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50(1): 137-144.

Anon. 2008. Mealy Bug: a new threat to cotton production in Pakistan and India. The ICAC Recorder, International Cotton Advisory Committee, Tech Inf. Sect. Vol. XXVI(2):15-19.

Genter, L. G., 1925. Some important grape insects. Michigan Agric. Expt. Sta. Spec. Bull., 14: 19-23.

Gowda, B. G., Chakravarthy, A. K., Jagadish, K. S. and. Kandakoor, S. B., 2014. Ecology and distribution of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara De Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in South Karnataka, Current Biotica, 7(4): 266-274.

Jacobson, M., Reed, D.K., Crystal, M. M., Moreno, D. S., and Soderstrom, E. L. (1978). Chemistry and biological activity of insect feeding deterrents from certain weed or crop plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24: 248-257.

Janet, J. K., Kinzer, K. and Smith, R., 2009. Houseplants; Proper Care and Management of Pest Problems, NDSU extension service, North Dakota State University and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Available online: www.ag.ndsu.edu.

Lysandrou, M., Ahmad, M. and Longhurst C., 2012. Management of mealybug, phenacoccus solenopsis tinsley in cotton with a new sap feeding insecticide “SULFOXAFLOR”, J. Agric. Res., 50(4) :494-496.

PCD Perera and N Dahanayake (2015).Studying the effects of Paracoccus marginatus (Mealybug) attack on forming of Tagets spp. (Indian Marigold) flower. Proceedings of the Research Symposium of UvaWellassa University: 61.

PCD Perera and Nilanthi Dahanayake (2016). Awareness about Exacum species (Binara/Ginihiriya) amoung the university students of Sri Lanka. International Symposium on Agriculture and Environment (ISAE): 82-84.

Prishanthini, M. and Laxmi V.M., 2009. The Phenococcus solenopsis. Department of Zoology, Eastern University, Sri Lanka. Available online: http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/07/01/fea30.asp.

Saini, R. K., Palaram, S. S. and Rohilla, H. R., 2009. Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its survival in cotton ecosystem in Haryana. In: Proc. Nat. Symp. Bt Cotton: Opportunities and Prospects, Central Institute of Cotton Research, Nagpur, November 17-19: 150.

Smith, M. R., 1928. The biology of Tapinoma sessile Say, an important house-infesting ant. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. XXI: 307-330.

University of California, 2001. Integrated pest management for floriculture and nurseries. University of California statewide integrated pest management project, Division of agriculture and natural resources publication 3402: 179-189.

Vennila, S., Prasad, Y.G., Prabhaka,r M., Kumar, R., Nagrare V., Amuth, M., Dharajyothi, Agarwa,l M., Sreedevi, G., Venkateswarlu B., Kranthi, K.R. and Bambawale, O.M., 2011, Spatio-temporal Distribution of Host Plants of Cotton Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in India, Technical Bulletin No. 26, National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi: 50-62.

Williams, D.J. and Granara de Willink, M.C., 1992. Mealybugs of Central and South America, CAB International: 635.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-17

Issue

Section

Short Note/communication